Transport Insights

The transport stories you won't see in the industry-friendly media

Author

Chris Ames
  • Throwing good money after bad?

    At the time or writing, the media are carrying reports that chancellor Rachel Reeves has “awarded” the Lower Thames Crossing another £590m but no announcement has been published by the Treasury, the Department for Transport or National Highways.

    This is the way the government manipulates the media these days, sending out press releases to favoured outlets with quotes that no-one actually said and no detail, very much discouraging questions about how it will work in practice.

    The BBC reports that: “It came as part of a £1bn package to improve transport infrastructure across England, announced on Monday.”:

    Except that no £1bn package has been announced. If it has, where is the detail?

    (more…)

  • Labour backpedals on public chargepoint target

    Labour appears to have dropped the Tory target of 300,000 public chargepoints for EVs by 2030, as well as its own pledge to set new “binding targets”.

    That’s reading between the lines of a Department for Transport (DfT) press release, which says the government is “set to” roll out 100,000 chargepoints in England, “in the coming years” and makes no mention of the 300,000 target.

    In fact, the DfT now says “tens of thousands of chargepoints” will be installed by 2030.

    The 300,000 by 2030 target, which applies to the UK as a whole, was in the Tories’ March 2022  electric vehicle infrastructure strategy, which has not been withdrawn.

    In its 2023 Plan for the Automotive Sector, Labour said the Tory government was “on course to miss its aim of having 300,000 public chargers available by 2030 by a decade”, which it said “will leave drivers fighting over available chargepoints.”

    (more…)

  • Has capital funding for English roads really increased?

    There was very little detail about capital funding for roads in England in Wednesday’s Spending Review, which covers the four-years from 2026-27 to 2029-30 as far as capital is concerned:

    Providing £24 billion of capital funding between 2026‑27 and 2029‑30 to maintain and improve motorways and local roads across the country. This funding increase will allow National Highways and local authorities to invest in significantly improving the long-term condition of England’s road network, delivering faster, safer and more reliable journeys;

    National Highways’ interim settlement for 2025-26 is £4.8bn of which £3.4bn is capital, while capital funding for local road maintenance in England is “nearly £1.6 billion”, according to the Department for Transport, which includes £500m of additional funding announced in the October Budget.

    So, the £6bn annual average announced yesterday is on the face of it higher than the current approximately £5bn, but might get eaten away by inflation.

    And then there is the vague phrase “to…improve…local roads”. There are various other capital funding streams for local road enhancements, including what was called the Major Roads Fund – large local majors and the major road network.

    (more…)

  • National Highways cuts delays…on publishing its plans

    National Highways’ delivery plan and a separate “safety action plan” for the current financial year will be published “this summer”, the government-owned company has said, following a delay to last year’s delivery plan and the outright suppression of an “enhanced safety plan” for the year.

    However, National Highways, the Department for Transport (DfT) and regulator the Office of Rail and have Road (ORR) all refused freedom of information (FOI) requests to release the safety action plan until the company can put its spin on it in the delivery plan, which is always a glossy promotional document produced at public expense to boost the company’s public image.

    (more…)

  • Welcome to Transport Insights

    This new blog from freelance journalist Chris Ames will bring you all the news that’s unfit to print from UK and transport sectors, covering the stories behind the stories you may see elsewhere and calling out some of the spin and misrepresentation, as well as bringing exclusives from my own investigations.

    The commercial interests of advertisers and sponsors (there aren’t any) and exhibition participants will not be taken into account.

Subscribe

Subscribe to get our the latest stories in your inbox.